Cut! Take two! Really?

I'm still trying to wrap my brain around this one. They're remaking "True Grit."
 
Why, you might ask? How do you improve upon a classic?
 
Let's look back. John Wayne won the Oscar in 1969 for his portrayal of Rooster Cogburn, the irascible federal marshal tracking down and generally killing various bad guys in the Oklahoma territories sometime after the Civil War. Yes, those were actual New Mexican mountains that appeared in Oklahoma, but that's Hollywood. This movie makes a lot of people's all-time favorites lists – it's in my top five – but let's be honest. Wayne was quite good, and I think he won the Oscar mostly for a couple of scenes toward the end when his character had to show real tenderness. However, Glen Campbell as the Texas Ranger was brutal (by his own admission), and Kim Darby seeking vengeance for Papa's death wasn't much better. (Robert Duvall was, as always, quite good, and so were Strother Martin, Jeff Corey and, wow, Dennis Hopper, but they had smaller roles.)
 
So why mess with it? Because, unless it's "Gone With the Wind," Hollywood will remake anything. "The Philadelphia Story" (1940, Jimmy Stewart's first Oscar) remains a gem. They remade it, as a musical no less, 16 years later with Frank Sinatra and others as "High Society." It worked. Of course, many remakes are irredeemably bad ideas. "King Kong," "Psycho" and "Planet of the Apes" spring to mind. Can they improve on "True Grit"?
 
This is where it gets interesting. It's being made by the Coen brothers. Right, as in "No Country for Old Men," "O Brother Where Art Thou" and, more recently, the so-so "Burn After Reading." Their work is consistently very good. Reportedly, they plan to be more faithful to the novel that first movie. I've read the novel. It's fine but less crisp that the John Wayne version. It's no "Old Yeller."
 
So, the big question: Who's the Rooster? My first thought was Russell Crowe, but I don't know. One rumor is Jeff Bridges. Really? I refer to the remake of "King Kong" (but he was good in "Iron Man" last year). Someone threw out Tom Wilkinson, who I really do think could play anyone or anything. It would be fun.
 
What do you think? Who's Rooster? Who's Mattie? And LaBouef? Quincy, Moon and Stonehill? How about Dennis Hopper as the judge? As for Lucky Ned Pepper, how about Robert Duvall all over again? He's still got it. I welcome your thoughts.
 

Comments

Say it ain't so!
A remake of "True Grit?" I remember my mom taking me to see it at a theater on the Plaza and it was being picketed by a group of folks who were against the Viet Nam War.
Funny, the little things you remember. I don't recall what I had for breakfast yesterday, but I will never forget John Wayne's line, "Fill you hand you SOB's," then he took on Ned and Co.
For the remake, I'd cast Will Smith and Kevin Kline and, oh, wait, I'm having a "Wild, Wild West" flashback. Never been much of a fan of Coen brothers...still trying to figure out the ending to "No Country for Old Men." Some things are better left undone - like a remake of this classic....

   

                 Rooster Cogburn : Kurt Russell
                 Mattie Ross : Perez Hilton (just kidding)    let's go with Taylor Swift
                 Le Boeuf : Christopher Walken
                 Emmett Quincy : Travis Tritt
                 Lucky Ned Pepper : Robert Duvall
                 Moon : Sam Shepherd
                 Col. G. Stonehill : Tom Skerritt
                 Tom Chaney : Tom Sizemore
                 Barlow : Jude Law
                 Judge Parker : Val Kilmer

eldoggg

Some intriguing ideas. I haven't cared for anything Kurt Russell has done since Disney. How about Shia LaBeouf for Le Boeuf. No, really. He did that Indiana Jones thing and was OK. I like Tom Skerritt for Stonehill, the horse trader. Tom Sizemore is very good when he's not on drugs, which, as of a few months ago, he was doing again. Sad. He should have won an Oscar for "Saving Private Ryan."

Jeff Fox, opinion page editor, The Examiner, jeff.fox@examiner.net, 816-350-6313

.........you didn't like Kurt in Tombstone?.........how about  Christopher Walken as a scary "Texas Ranger?........I thought the SAME thing as everybody else and started to say so.......how NOBODY could EVER fill  "the Duke's" shoes..........that it's one of those parts where everybody is going to compare and say "uck"..........it is kinda a sad state of affairs when Hollywood is so sterile that it  has to resort to remakes and sequels all the time.........it really makes me feel old that they're remaking movies I was around the FIRST time for.......ROFL........but in the spirit of the blog header I spent 4 1/2 minutes trying to make a contribution.......I somehow felt that the Coen brothers WERE'NT going to be giving me a call to be their new casting director........(sniff , sniff)................and so it is..........once again .........(crickets chirping)................

eldoggg

Take the cheap road:   Hire Frank Caliendo and Kevin Pollack to "do" the entire cast!
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQZ_GKN9Ufw

.......I like Frank but a little of him goes a loooooong way for me.......I don't know if I could TAKE a couple hours of him...........when he does all that instantaneous swtiching of personalities and voices it kinda makes me neurotic..........I mean REALLY.............when you get John Madden , George W. , Bill Clinton and a host of other alpha dogs in ONE room?..............whew !!!..................I

eldoggg

Good choices but  I think Tom Selleck for Roster, and Colin Farrel for Ned....
They redid Stagecoach a couple of times and it never worked... The Duke, was the Duke......

.......I like bOTH of  those choices too.......

eldoggg

Eldoggg you worked hard on this but I have to go along with Bill Althaus forget it we just should not mess with it!!! I Loved that movie and John.   xox 

Let's face it, you can't ever "replace" a great like John Wayne. This is sacred territory here...which says to me this remake is doomed from the start.
Just another example of how Hollywood has no imagination anymore, so they have to remake every movie all over again. How about something new and original?
Hollywood is running all the writers and actors out of work with the TV "reality" shows, while movies focus more on utilizing new technology than coming up with new ideas. It's really pretty sad.